I often find myself discouraged by responses to humanitarian crises because they are the wrong responses. People don't like being told that their compassion leads to more harm than good - even though it can and does. People assume any help is good and so don't bother to learn what constitutes real assistance. Poor people cannot afford our mistakes.
Part of this is our fault, those of us who are professionals in the field of humanitarian response. We don't educate the public as well as we could. We don't teach the lessons we've learned - usually the hard way - over the past half-century.
WorldVision, an organization which knows what it's doing, offers a short primer on the myths surrounding disaster relief. I'm just going to print the whole thing:
" 1. Americans can help by collecting blankets, shoes and clothingPosted by MartialThe cost of shipping these items -- let alone the time it takes to sort, pack and ship them -- is prohibitive. Often, those items are manufactured for export to the U.S. from these same countries. It is far more efficient to purchase them locally.
2. Helping the living always has priority over burying the dead
In refugee camps and epidemic situations where people die of diseases, it is essential to dispose of the bodies within a short period of time. If they died of other causes such as drowning, they are less of a health risk but pose an impediment to relief efforts and delay the mourning process.
3. The United States must airlift food and medicines to the disaster site
Food is virtually always available within a day's drive of the disaster site. Purchasing the food locally is more cost-efficient, and it ensures that the food is appropriate to local residents' tastes and religious requirements. Medicines are often available within the country, too. India, for example, has a large pharmaceutical industry. Because medicines are high-value, low-weight commodities, in some cases they can and must be airlifted in to save lives.
4. If I send cash, my help won't get there
Reputable agencies send 80 percent or more of cash donations to the disaster site; the rest goes for administration, operating expenses and monitoring the efficiency of their own operations. Donors have a right and a responsibility to ask aid groups how they will be using those donations, and what will be done with donations raised in excess of the need.
5. Once someone survives the immediate disaster, he or she is safe
The immediate catastrophe kills quickly; survivors can face a slower death from hunger, disease and even criminal predators. While emergency medical teams certainly are needed for people injured in a disaster, the best way to keep survivors healthy is to provide clean water and adequate sanitation. Cholera and dysentery can result from drinking contaminated water; malaria-spreading mosquitoes breed in standing water.
6. Developing countries depend on foreign expertise
While specialized assistance is always welcome, most relief and recovery efforts are accomplished by local aid groups, police, firefighters and neighbors before international teams arrive. Also, in recent years most governments have established disaster preparedness plans.
7. Relief needs are so intense that almost anyone can fly to the scene to offer help
Professionals with specialized skills and overseas disaster experience are often deployed to disaster sites. Volunteers without those skills can do more harm than good, and siphon off critical logistics and translations services. Hiring disaster survivors is much more cost efficient and provides much needed employment.
8. Survivors feel lucky to be alive
Shock, trauma and the mourning for loved ones who died are common among disaster survivors. Often, they wish it was they who died instead of their loved ones. Treating these emotional needs is an essential component of relief efforts.
9. Insurance and governments can cover losses
The vast majority of the world's population has never heard of an insurance policy, let alone are able to purchase one. Further, governments of poor countries can barely meet ongoing social service needs, let alone provide a safety net like FEMA. Disaster survivors must bear these costs alone.
10. People are helpless in the face of natural disasters
The United States is proof that tougher building codes, early warning and disaster preparedness can save lives. Even in poor countries, communities are taking steps to mitigate the loss of life in future emergencies. "
I had dinner recently with someone who has been involved in Heifer for a long time--back in the day, post-WW II, they really did ship livestock overseas, including some of his, but that time has long passed. He said that people seem really disappointed that Heifer doesn't do that anymore, even though it would not be at all cost-effective.
I think everyone should read Amartya Sen for a perspective on famine and hunger--especially the part about famines being overwhemingly caused by lack of money rather than lack of regionally-available food.
Posted by: me2i81 on January 6, 2005 12:12 PMYou would think that your list of 10 would be evident to anyone who put some thought into their response; but so often people "think" by the knee-jerk responses they've been conditioned to and by the widely accepted, "Everyone knows...."
Good stuff. Keep on saying it. Maybe it will get through, at least to a few.
Posted by: Sarah on January 6, 2005 06:27 PMAmartya Sen's Development As Freedom is crucial, providing a framework for understanding poverty and how to mitigate it. However, I would be much harsher in my phrasing about the cause of famine than Sen - a thorough gentleman and, after all, an economist - is.
I would put the cause of famine in this way: Famines don't occur because of lack of food. Famines occur because of lack of access to food. Such a lack is always political in nature. No child on this planet starves except that some politician has made a decision to kill that child.
I happen to see that as profoundly hopeful rather than depressing. If people are making bad choices, then they can learn to make different, better ones.
Posted by: Martial on January 7, 2005 04:55 PMTestify, brother.
Posted by: Kevin Moore on January 8, 2005 02:30 AM